That's fine. We're okay on that. Done.
All we're saying is that when all the suggestions come in—as we did, by the way, for Bill C-30, and as we've done in other committees—we actually have a steering committee that balances everything off and makes sure that everybody's view is represented. That's all. To think that one person's judgment on what looks like balance is better than the judgment of four people, who collectively represent the four parties, is, with all respect, rather a lot.
Basically, either you're neglecting the evidence that shows the overall effectiveness of steering committees—and I'm not ascribing this second motive to you—or somehow or other, we're trying to end run the decision of the committee to have a steering committee. I'd love to know, if you're not prepared to have a steering committee do what a steering committee traditionally does, under what conditions we would ever have a steering committee, despite the will of the majority of this committee.