That's right. So I have to say you haven't convinced me at all that non-use value is a factor in compensation.
I can understand why some international shippers may be a little wary if they're getting that kind of information. So would you kindly, on our behalf, take back to them that non-use value is not in this act as a compensatory issue, only an aggravating feature? If you'd tell them that, maybe they'll feel a little better.
Do I have another few minutes?