Yes. In proposed new paragraph 49(1)(d.3), I would suggest adding the words “or for”. It would read:
directing the person to pay, in the manner prescribed by the court, an amount to environmental or other groups to assist in their work in or for the community where the offence was committed;
Again, for the same reason, the court may deem that there is a scientific institute or some organization that has been helping an isolated community in dealing with an impact. It still relates to the community, but the funds could go to somebody who is doing work in the community or for the community.