I think that's a fair characterization. We didn't go and do a field testing and say these will be the results. You have to assume the systems are in place for a reason, and in this case the reason is to protect fish habitat. If the systems aren't working, I think the conclusion is therefore that the habitats are at risk, but we didn't go and do a field test to look at different sites to see whether or not conditions have improved. That's the role of the government.
On May 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.