Evidence of meeting #23 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was appointments.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jeffrey Hutchings  Chair, Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC)

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Yes. What do you mean by that?

10:30 a.m.

Prof. Jeffrey Hutchings

Well, to my mind, a political appointment would be one in which you appoint an individual because of his or her political affiliations, the degree to which their activities or thoughts or opinions would be consistent with a particular political body of thought. A ministerial appointment would be one that is independent of those political affiliations.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

That's your personal opinion?

10:30 a.m.

Prof. Jeffrey Hutchings

Yes.

I would add that they're perhaps analogous to judiciary appointments, which are prime ministerial appointments but not political appointments.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Is Dr. Green a personal friend of yours?

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

I'd just caution you that when--

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

I'll withdraw the question.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

Yes; we're talking about a third party who isn't present and can't defend himself.

Mr. Watson.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON

On a point of order, Mr. Chair, your decision in this regard was overruled by--

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

It was overruled concerning the process. I can still caution you.

Even though you guys have parliamentary privilege here, as does the witness, I still--

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON

Could I at least complete my statement?

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

Go ahead, Mr. Watson.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

By my understanding, because the discussion of political appointments is now in play, then exploring that should also be in play.

The decision was overruled, Mr. Chair. It's been put in play. In fair game, questions exploring that avenue should be in play.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

I withdrew the question.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON

Fair enough.

10:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

Mr. Watson has raised a point of order. I do have to address that.

My ruling this morning was based on Dr. Hutchings' opening statement. He was talking about the process of the nomination of certain members of COSEWIC. That's where I ruled. It was grounded on what we do here as a committee according to Marleau and Montpetit. I was overruled by the majority of the committee.

He can definitely talk about the nomination process, but I am just cautioning individuals that, with respect to Dr. Green, he is not here to defend himself. In our role as parliamentarians, we should not bring forward any comments that might be disparaging.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON

To the point, then, Mr. Chair, I think the question was based on the witness' subjective perspective, and it was based on their relationship, not the opposite direction.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

The reason I interceded was that I saw that Mr. Braid's comments were getting rather personal. It was about the relationship between Dr. Hutchings and Dr. Green.

Continue on. I'll add on two minutes.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Thank you.

Mr. Hutchings, you've very properly used the word “advice”, I think both in your presentation and through some responses to questions. Would you agree that, by definition, advice is something that one either accepts or does not accept?

10:35 a.m.

Prof. Jeffrey Hutchings

I've already stated as such this morning.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Thank you.

Recommendation 1, anyway, seems somewhat constructive. I'm just curious to know how you came up with the three-month timeframe.

May 28th, 2009 / 10:35 a.m.

Prof. Jeffrey Hutchings

Basically, the minister currently has 90 days, or three months, to issue a response statement. Once the assessments have been communicated to the Governor in Council, the Governor in Council has nine months to make a legal listing decision.

So it's basically three plus nine.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Okay.

With whom did you consult with respect to your recommendation on the three-month timeframe?

10:35 a.m.

Prof. Jeffrey Hutchings

I consulted with members of COSEWIC.

Basically, what happened is that I established a SARA parliamentary working group two and a half years ago. That working group met and made some recommendations. Then, in March, prior to being notified that I might be appearing before this committee, I drafted this document. I circulated it to the members of the working group on COSEWIC. Then we discussed it in full during our species assessment meeting in St. Andrews during the last week of April.

So it's a product of all of those things.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Braid Conservative Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Did you consult with anyone from the Department of the Environment?