I understand this is the first review of SARA, right? With CEPA, we had five-year reviews on and on and on for two or more decades. I'm wondering what your recommendation would be to our committee? What should the focus of this first review be? Should we be looking for people to tell us how to amend the act, which seems to be what happened to CEPA? Over and over and over again it was amended. I'm getting the impression, and correct me if I'm wrong, that you seem to be looking more pragmatically: yes, maybe the act can be perfected, but let's concentrate on actually applying what the letter of the law says right now. We're not actually applying it, including the community consultations, including the transparency and resourcing and so forth.
On June 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.