As a lawyer, I'm delighted that you've identified the need to define terms. While I think that Mr. McGuinty is making an interesting suggestion, I frankly don't think it's necessarily your role or responsibility to come up with those. What I would certainly recommend is your recommendations on the framework and how to do it. I think you've done that to an extent in here.
When I worked in Indonesia--I think it was also in Bangladesh--I saw that when they table a law, they actually have an interpretation document. It actually tells you what is meant by those terms. I'm wondering if you think that kind of document might be useful, rather than going back and opening up the act and clarifying those definitions. Over time we may well have to. If it was done transparently, which, unfortunately, has not been the history of lawmaking in this current government, and we actually had an open, transparent process with academics and landowners and NGOs and so forth, do you think that would be a good way to come up with that definitions document? It could be seen as a public document for reading the statute.