I think it's a combination of those, really, that you're looking at. We're looking at recovery planning. You'd still list a species. But then in terms of recovery planning, we have 425 species currently listed, and a small number of those actually have recovery plans in place. We're trying to find a way to work to efficiently protect species. Until you get these recovery plans in place, lots of the recovery planning doesn't occur, and the ability to find ways to manage human activities doesn't occur either. So we're looking for a solution to the recovery planning process.
It has been recommended by your own reports. The Office of the Auditor General, in 2008, and the Stratos report, in 2006, all came to the same conclusion, that we have to move towards recovery planning on an ecosystem basis in order to address the huge backlog, and to address multiple species in the same area could have conflicting requirements. So you have to balance those off also.