Evidence of meeting #29 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was targets.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

I'm not asking about the cost of not doing it. I am asking you if you know how much public revenue, if any, will be required to implement this bill.

10 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

That's the government's responsibility. You are the government.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

So you don't know whether this bill will comply with Standing Order 79.

10 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

Have you asked the Parliamentary Budget Officer whether this will—

10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Actually, that's one of the questions I'm going to direct my attention to in a minute, because as I understand it, in the last Parliament regarding the almost identical bill, your leader admitted that he had no idea how much economic damage this bill would do to the Canadian economy.

Since that time, you have had an opportunity to advise your leader about the economic impact of this bill, and so I want to ask you, have you asked the Library of Parliament to research for you the impact of these measures, both to public revenue and to the economy at large?

10 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

Yes, I have, and I did not get a straightforward answer.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Have you asked the Parliamentary Budget Officer the same questions about the need for public revenue or the impact on the economy of this bill?

10 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

I have not. Have you?

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

I'm asking you, sir. As a point of order, I don't think you can ask me questions here.

So you have not. Have you, in fact, compiled any actual data yourself about either the public revenue, if any, that would be required or the impact on the economy of this measure you're proposing?

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

Yes, I have, and I'd be happy to provide some of that information to the committee or to you afterwards. For example, Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute has indicated clearly, and has good data to support it, that the benefits and cost savings of appropriate measures to reduce greenhouse gases greatly exceed the costs....

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

I'm not asking you about the benefits. I am asking you about the costs. And I'm happy to wait to receive the information you have personally compiled on that.

I would like, if I have time, to ask whether you're aware that the government's assessment of attempting to meet the Kyoto targets--not your bill, but the Kyoto targets--within the 2008-2012 period would have resulted in a GDP drop of 4%. Are you aware of that information?

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

I'm aware that there have been many estimates as to what the costs might be of implementing these. There are wide-ranging--

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Are you telling me that you're not aware that this is the government's information?

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

I'm going to try to reiterate that there are a variety of projections as to what costs might or might not be, and they're both positive and negative.

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

You know, I hate to sound too much like a lawyer, but this is a question that could be answered yes or no. Are you aware, yes or no, that the government's information is that Kyoto targets within the Kyoto period would have resulted in a 4% GDP drop?

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

I think the question is irrelevant.

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Again, Mr. Chair, as a point of order, am I allowed to get an answer, or do we have to accept the witness's refusal?

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

Yes, you should answer the question, Mr. Hyer.

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

I'll stick with my answer.

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Chair, is there any recourse against a witness who won't answer questions?

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Bruce Hyer NDP Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

I'm not here today to debate Kyoto. I'm here to talk about Bill C-311.

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

Okay, in chapter 20 of Marleau and Montpetit--

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

It is contextual for my next question.

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Bezan

Well, your time has expired, but I do ask that Mr. Hyer.... It reads:

Witnesses must answer all questions which the committee puts to them. A witness may object to a question asked by an individual committee member. However, if the committee agrees that the question be put to the witness, he or she is obliged to reply.

We do have a request for an answer to the last question from Mr. Woodworth. We are asking that you respond. I know that it's tough as a parliamentarian to play the witness. We're used to being the members.

A point of order, Madam Duncan.

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Linda Duncan NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

On a point of order, Mr. Chair, in the second part of the ruling, you said that the committee has to agree that the question is relevant. So it should be put to the committee, and if we agree that the question's relevant, then he can put the question.