Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Can I go back to that very informative line of questioning by Mr. Braid?
When you looked at the tax deductible transit pass and you found out, Mr. Vaughan, that the government had been forewarned that it wasn't good ecological fiscal policy to pursue policies where the cost per tonne for production was over $800, did you come across any documentation that presented alternatives to the government--such as, for example, the well-known fact inside the Department of Finance that it is better for the federal government to take scarce taxpayer dollars and allocate them towards infrastructure costs for transit than it is to try to incent behaviour for those who are already riding transit, particularly when we knew the cost would be well over $800 a tonne?
Did you come across any evidence on that front?