One of the issues you brought forward was the conditional nature of some of the other countries' targets. You mentioned something along the lines of a 30% reduction from 1990 levels for the European Union by 2020. This is extremely ambitious and dependent on other countries' participation. Canada's position is to reduce emission levels by 3% from 1990 levels. According to Dr. Stone, whom we heard from on Tuesday, the 2006 benchmark would actually have us going over 1990 levels by 2% or 3%. We seem to be quibbling over hairs.
Do you think it's not countries like Canada, which is refusing to set ambitious science-based targets, that are interfering with the progress the whole world is trying to make? If we're putting forward conditional but very ambitious targets, should we not also be participating in that and trying to be a world leader instead of a cautious laggard?