I will argue in the same direction. As I said in my speaking points, assessing the costs of any greenhouse gas reduction policy is something that is difficult to do without knowing what exact policy instruments you have. Usually I receive the question: what is the cost of doing this, what is the cost of doing that? I can't provide any answer if I don't have some additional information about what the policy instruments are that are going to be used and the costs related to the policy instruments. Especially, how do you recycle the revenue?
In terms of the cost per se, usually when you look at it from a GDP perspective, this is something that might seem relatively low. The reason is because our GDP, for example, is more than 60% of the service sector, and the service sector is not the one that is emissions-intensive.
As I said in my speaking points, we do have heterogeneity among the sectors. There are some sectors that will be affected more than others, so we shouldn't look at the GDP aggregate impact alone, but also we should take into consideration the sector impact, which will have some implications for jobs, regions, and so forth. This is what the modelling results all tell us.