Because I have only five minutes, I would like to give you an example and then you can comment on it.
About 25 years ago, we tried to get windmills going. Nobody wanted the government to get involved in windmills, because the economists—and only the economists—said that it wasn't viable. The arguments were based solely on economic non-viability. The fact that it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions was hushed up.
What might cause you to adopt a different approach? You have talked about listening. Other than listening, are you going to adopt a different approach to a new technology you are not familiar with, but that open-minded people are advising you to move toward, even if it is not economically viable at the moment?