I think I'd take the question a little bit more at face value. Particularly as far as section 41 is concerned, dealing with recovery strategies, it would be very helpful for somebody with experience on the ground, working on recovery strategies, to have explicit language in there about scientific input. In fact, that scientific input is perhaps what you mean by supervision being the primary focus.
That section is confusing because it says the minister must prepare this recovery strategy in cooperation with a number of groups, including stakeholders, aboriginal groups, and so on. It doesn't specifically mention scientific expertise. In actual fact, generally speaking, certainly in the strategies that I'm familiar with, scientific expertise or scientific experts have been part of the process. They've been consulted.
But there is considerable confusion, really, particularly about what should be done with stakeholder input at that level. If a stakeholder comes to a recovery strategy deliberation and says that the actions, or at least a set of methodologies to protect this species, are going to hurt his or her livelihood, we, as recovery team members, don't have clear instruction about whether we should include that in the strategy or not. I think this group is saying that it's appropriate to address those sorts of things in the plan, but not in the strategy.