You mentioned, Dr. Boyd, that there are 170 countries with legally recognized environmental bills of rights. They're not necessarily constitutional rights, are they? They're just bills of rights. Those countries represent 90% of the globe.
I know that our environmental performance has not been stellar, but is it possible that the countries that are doing well economically and environmentally and have these bills of rights have no real cause and effect between having the bill of rights and having good environmental or economic performance? It could be that the country doesn't have a fossil fuels industry, already has a good environmental record, and passes an environmental bill of rights perhaps almost as a way of patting itself on the back. I don't know.
Have you been able to look at the causation rather than just the correlation?