I will, and I will try not to interrogate myself.
I just want to assure the witnesses that we have very good Hansard folks. They will not misattribute comments that were made most recently.
I want to go to the actual differences between this proposed act and what you now have as a framework. You have a legal framework that emanates from a variety of different legislative sources, and I'm wondering if you could focus for us.... I know in your presentation you talked very specifically about the broadest implication, which is this overarching reference to the bill of rights.
Actually, I wonder if you could help educate us a bit. The bill of rights has been around for some time. How has that been implemented over the years? Obviously the charter has taken precedence in many important areas, but the presentation you made to us—I'm going to ask this question first—is about the implications of it having this overarching charter reference that it must comply with. How would that be enforced? What do we know from the past use of charter-based rights how legally it would be binding on the government?