I offer my comments to the committee not as an expert on provincial law. I've had occasion to read the provincial statutes that we've been discussing, including statutes from the Yukon and the Northwest Territories, so I very much offer my comments in that context. I hope they answer your question to some degree.
What I've noticed is that the statutes from these four jurisdictions do, in some way, recognize environmental rights. However, all the rights being recognized don't necessarily mean the same thing.
Why would I say that, not being an expert in provincial law? Well, for one, on their face, they're worded differently. Some have limitations, which we've alluded to, in particular in Quebec.
Also, the legislation of the Northwest Territories, the Yukon, and Ontario does not provide for a specific right of action against the government for violating a right to a healthy and ecologically balanced environment.
I've also compared the civil causes of action, which I can speak to you about, if you'd like, although I don't know if at this point if....