Yes, sure.
Mr. Melaschenko, I want to take issue with the reply you gave about the potential for duplication of the power or responsibility of the Department of Justice to review consistency with the Canadian Bill of Rights. That's fine, and I take that on the face of it. That's good. It would be nice in fact if that's being delivered. That might be something we'll be “watchdogging”.
But what clause 26 deals with is not consistency with the bill of rights but consistency with the environmental bill of rights. Would it not be fair to say that is not necessarily an overlap? It may be the case for clause 28, but it's certainly not the case for the remainder of the bill. That responsibility is not prescribed anywhere else specifically.
I'm not saying that the role of Justice is to be looking at consistency and so forth, and hopefully that happens when legislation is tabled. But I want to seek your clarification on that.