It's to the point of order not about an accusation that Mr. Warawa was out of order because he's used the word “coalition” and has impugned the motives of the others. What I'm trying to say is that, ordinarily, coalition simply means a group of people who come together to support the same cause.
Of course, in this Parliament, because of the events in the House, that has taken on a more partisan meaning involving the Bloc, the Liberals, and the NDP voting together to pursue certain shared goals. Indeed there are times when occasionally an opposition party has voted with the government, and I hear shouts from across the way from people who lose votes talking about a Conservative such-and-such coalition.
So it's clearly a partisan term. In a way, it would be nice if we lived in a world where every time a partisan term was used, we could raise a point of order. But whatever we think of partisan terms, I don't think it's necessarily the proper subject for a ruling on a point of order.
Quite frankly, if it were the case that we were going to outlaw partisan terms, just in relation to this debate I'd be objecting, because lots of other times when partisan remarks have been made I've been the target. We should have an even application of these rules.
So whatever we think of partisan terms, I don't think it's a matter of a point of order.