Thank you.
Very quickly, I can't believe what I just heard from Ms. Duncan. The whole purpose of a bill of rights is to be a lens by which all other statutes and government actions are to be examined. Clearly, at the very least, if we were simply talking about federal agreements with aboriginal groups, they would definitely be subject to be set aside under the provisions of clauses 16 to 19 of this bill. I think it's even quite arguable that a federal statute, which some judge determined didn't live up to the standard of trusteeship of the environment mandated in this bill, could be likely subject to scrutiny unless it specifically said it was an act that notwithstanding anything contained in this bill.... At the very least, certainly agreements or other non-statutory actions of the federal government relating to aboriginal land would be subject to being set aside under this bill. That's the whole purpose of this bill, to do exactly that, to set aside federal action that doesn't measure up in a judge's eyes.