Thank you, colleagues, for allowing me to follow up a bit on some of the things I had started to ask.
I want to come back to the progress versus no progress, the idea that progress is picking up. The very specific question is, 35 more species have critical habitats in the last ten months, but how many of the ones that have protection plans also have critical habitats and real protection for those habitats? I think that's what we want to understand. It's one thing to have a plan, but if the critical habitat isn't identified, where are we? As we watch the cascading delays or difficulties, we see that at the end of the day there's only a handful that have critical habitats. So out of these last 35, which are the most recent products of the act's implementation, what is their status? Do they have critical habitats identified?