Can we just elaborate a little bit on that question?
I appreciate you're trying to get through some questions, but the question was specifically focused on loss of habitat. Although I defer to your scientific expertise, I think it's inappropriate to characterize the issue as strictly a loss of habitat. I think it's a question of quality of habitat, because of course loss of habitat immediately raises the spectre of putting a fence around a piece of land and saying that nobody can do anything with it, as opposed to working with partners--which comes back to many of the questions we heard earlier--whether they be provincial, private, or aboriginal, and encouraging appropriate management of habitat in a way that enables species to recover and commercial or recreational activities to occur.