On the aquatic side, some of this stuff is still before the courts, so I have to be very careful about what comments I make, particularly about the Fisheries Act piece of it.
Three or four decisions have come down that have provided direction that our department and the others are reflecting on, partly around best available information. The second area is around when you need a protection order, when you can use a protection statement, and when it's appropriate to move forward in either of those two areas.
Perhaps most significantly, we are reflecting on what's included in habitat. What do you need to consider when you're defining critical habitat? It says it's not just a geographic area; it is availability of prey. In the case of the killer whale it includes aquatics generally, but also acoustics, etc. We're now going back to look at the protection statements and protection orders we've issued and reflect on whether they are sufficient. Going forward we will have to think about those pieces as well. It makes it more complex, but the courts have decided those things.