I would probably defer...and you may want to ask the department again.
My understanding is that they have chosen four objectives and they've put together the programs that exist at the federal level related to those four objectives. I don't see a sense of priority or a ranking or a hierarchy in which those priorities are reached.
It goes back then, as section 3 also says, to environmental decision-making. To me, environmental decision-making is different from the presentation of programs. It would be the process by which the decision is made and what the trade-offs, the priorities, are. This is not a static presentation but rather the process by which these decisions come about.