I would say that the implementation of the processes, the comprehensive studies, and panel reviews is doing quite well.
As I noted, there are problems. I think the largest gap, and the major loss between the guidelines order process and CEAA, was on strategic environmental assessment. There actually were assessments done under EARPGO that can't be done anymore legally because there's no mechanism in place.
The cabinet guidelines directive is not transparent, so it's hard for me to say, beyond what the Auditor General's office has said previously, about how that's working. I would say that's the greatest loss we've had.