Very good. So the short answer is that it would actually benefit the industry if not only processes but standards were consistent and accommodated in a substitution or equivalency process. Thank you.
The other area I am interested in is on previously done assessments and the proposal for section 24 in your brief. This is addressed at page 6 of your brief to us. I've looked at the proposed amendment to section 24, and I want to make sure I understand it correctly.
First of all, I understand this has to do with cases where assessments have been performed in similar or related undertakings. Am I right on that?