It's interesting, because the sense we're getting from early conversations on national conservation is that part of the value is that you create a framework. We're a bit hesitant to declare the framework should be X because we don't think it's up to us to do that; we think that needs to work through the consultations. But as you create a framework and a sense of common purpose and collaboration, you bring together many different activities that aren't connected, and you can connect them around a common purpose or set of objectives, goals, targets, principles, etc.
We haven't mentioned it, but one of them is research, quite honestly. A tremendous amount of research on ecosystems happens within Environment Canada, and a tremendous amount happens across the country in academic institutions. Just simply aligning that and having that contribute is a major step forward, without getting maximum value from what we're already doing in research and monitoring. We're hopeful that this can be worked in to be part of that.