I actually just wanted to pick up on some of the comments Ms. Leslie made going back to the scope and structure of the study with regard to participant listing and then some of the supporting information we've all talked about. I wanted to summarize that as we close off here and get your thoughts.
What I've taken from today is that if we were to group the types of participants we should be inviting or making sure we're touching on, I've got aboriginal organizations; private sector organizations, which includes industry trade associations—to my colleague's comments on making sure that we include them—agriculture, forestry, and natural resources; non-governmental organizations, so conservation groups and other non-government organizations as well. And we have federal government departments—and you had expressed the depth and the breadth, so we've got Agriculture, Fisheries, etc.; other levels of government, according to some of the comments that came up here, so provincial, urban, and rural municipalities as well; and then academia.
Do you think that's a good sampling, based on who you invited to the round table, and that if we have some people under each of those lists that would probably give a good cross-section on the issue?