Thank you.
This is just a comment, Mr. Keenan, about your comments regarding the boreal forest industry. You made it sound as though we have $50 billion worth of commercial activity and $90 billion worth of other activity. You made it sound as though they're mutually exclusive. I hope you didn't mean that, because a well-managed, harvested boreal forest can also deliver those other non-monetary benefits that you discussed.
I don't need your answer on this, but I make that comment. The concept of working landscapes delivering environmental benefits is very important.
In that vein, in your two documents, which I'm reacting to, the lack of priority on working landscapes and the conservation activities of private landowners and agriculturalists bother me. Don't you think it is on the working landscapes where the greatest conservation gains can be made?