I'm falling into that redundancy problem again.
However, I will come back to the issue that Jeff has raised earlier about how you need your plan with your metrics so that you know what you've got, and then you can tell what you're losing if something is being cut here.
From my perspective, to answer your first question, in terms of developing new legislation processes, thinking about the oceans, about something that captures and forces an integrated coastal zone management or ecosystem management, whatever way you want to put that together, it's something that is going to be very important. Drive it similar to what you did with the Oceans Act, but push this forward so we develop out of that, plan the metrics, the other tools that we can use to assess what's going to happen if we cut or we do not provide the resources necessary to carry forth.
With regard to the climate change issue, yes, I agree with everything that's been said here before, but what I do know, especially in zones like the Arctic, where we're operating right now, is things are changing very rapidly. We need to put some resources into helping these local populations to cope with what's going to happen in the immediate short term, to understand how their lives are going to be different five years from now, ten years from now, while also trying to get to the point that we wrestle to the ground the commitments we need to make to control our own impacts.
Thank you.