Thank you.
With respect to section 128, which was quite well explained by the other witness, in terms of creating a little more breadth in the coverage of the act, there's an expiry date on that of January 2014 with respect to the exemptions that have been written back into the act by this bill.
Do you have a view on whether putting an expiry date of January 2014 makes sense? Would you agree with West Coast Environmental Law, which wrote us a letter suggesting that's a rather arbitrary thing to do and that no expiry date should be needed?