I guess, Mr. Woodworth, we're trying to label a very broad scope of what I call “deliverables”.
For me, it's really difficult. This is a personal perspective of wrapping my head around a title or a label and saying that urban conservation is a specific thing. In a broader scope, when I'm in a classroom teaching about sustainable sites and we're going out and having our students promote green roofs to a client, I've got to be able to knit essentially all those categories together, to really promote and understand what the net outcome is at the end of the day.
What are the inputs relative to environmental benefits? I hate getting into dollars, but there's still the economic implication in both the short and long term. How do we maintain it? How do we carry it on? What are the benefits from a societal standpoint? Are we really creating a space that people are getting something from, whether it's health and well-being or whether it's building a strong community? Again, folding in cultural attributes, we're a country that's pretty much a melting pot. We know that. When folks come in from other areas, it's the ability for them to identify what we consider urban conservation.
I know that's not an exact answer, but I guess I'm trying to cover the generalized statement about urban conservation. At the end of the day, what are the measurables that we're looking for or seeking out?