Okay. That leads me into my follow-up question on that. You say it may be of interest to look at in Canada. How can you see that helping in our process in Canada?
I know that the Australian model basically includes world heritage properties, wetlands of international importance, Commonwealth marine areas, nuclear actions, etc. They do have a really formalized process. They're also very formalized as to what would bring this assessment about.
How do you see that working out in Canada, then? You obviously have a liking for the model, to some degree, so how do you see that working within the Canadian structure?