Yes, there is. I think the initial screening process was designed to deal with that back when CEAA was originally developed. Of course, when you have a trigger under the environmental assessment.... For example, if a bridge, a minor stream crossing, necessitates a subsection 35(1) authorization of the Fisheries Act, that's a potential harmful alteration of fish habitat. That triggers CEAA. The federal jurisdiction, of course, goes far beyond the fisheries issues, and the federal Environment Assessment Act says you have to assess it all. You have this minor project for one stream crossing and, the next thing you know, you're into a full-fledged federal environmental assessment.
In circumstances that Mr. Hazell has aptly described, some of those circumstances are very well known and very well mitigated. This is why, for example, we have these operational statements that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans has in place. You follow those. Why do we need to have a separate federal environment assessment in that circumstance? I don't understand it.