Well, as I indicated, I tend to get involved in the larger projects, but sometimes the proponents can actually be small. You could have a small mining company, for example, that's been trying to develop a project for several years, all the way up to a large mining company that has a smaller project but is nevertheless caught—as Mr. Hazell indicated, sometimes these projects get caught for no apparent reason—under a law list trigger.
The projects are typically resource extraction projects and energy-related projects. These are all aspects of resource extraction, including clean energy.
The concept Mr. Hazell talked about, which is that we should have some recognition in the environmental assessment process of the positive benefits of things like clean energy, for example, I think is a very important statement to make. I don't see that necessarily in CEAA right now.
In fact, one could make an argument...and I think Professor Weaver at the University of Victoria, who is on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is strongly of the view that we're going to have to make some pretty dramatic decisions here. Sometimes these clean energy projects have to go through a process that is expedited, to get them through and get them to deal with the important issues Mr. Hazell has raised. By that, I mean clean energy in all forms: run-of-river power, hydroelectric power, and wind farms.
I can suggest names of witnesses who would be delighted to come forward from those various industries to give you an idea of how important that is.