Well, there have been a number.... I don't think the Minister of the Environment should have that authority. I think the approach the government should take should be the approach stated by the Supreme Court in Red Chris, which is that the project is the project as stated by the proponent, and neither the responsible authority nor the environment minister should be trying to narrow that down.
There are a lot of examples of so-called project-splitting. Among the most egregious is the case of True North, which is another case that went to the Supreme Court, in which you have an oil sands mine and there's a road and a bridge crossing associated with that.
The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, in its wisdom, decided to scope that tar sands mine project as a bridge and a road. In essence, the tar sands by itself was not subject to the environmental assessment. That was probably the most egregious example that one can think of. I just don't think it's a good idea for the Minister of Environment to have that authority.