Certainly.
Again, the Nature Conservancy of Canada is a wonderful partner in terms of protecting increasing thousands of hectares of nature, of land, while still allowing, as you say, the working landscape. In some parts of Canada and British Columbia, for example, some forestry operations are still allowed within a protected landscape, while at the same time other industrial operations, mining for example, will not be allowed. It also allows visitation more in the sense of a rugged adventure in pristine natural areas as opposed to visiting some of our traditional national parks, although it's still possible to have a great adventure in the Nahanni, the Nááts'ihch'oh, and Torngat parks.
As I've remarked here, the allocation under the supplementaries (C) is the final spending under a five-year program that the government funded with the Nature Conservancy of Canada. But if I could just caution against any reaction of dismay at the end of this program, when programs are created for a set period of time with a fixed budget, it is intended that, at the end of that term, the program be evaluated to see if it achieved its outcomes. Worthy programs tend to be renewed, others may not. I would just suggest here that for an answer one must wait for the budget.