I ask because the following has been shown in a number of studies and projects. In New York City they do upstream watershed work to obviate the need to build a billion dollar wastewater treatment plant. In short, the watershed conservation obviated the need for expenditure on hard infrastructure. Moorhead, Minnesota, right now is also looking at constructed wetlands for exactly the same reason.
We're asking you to think non-traditionally. My colleagues and I made a few disparaging comments about engineers, and I think we tend toward engineers' solutions. Ecological infrastructure is something the public really likes, and it provides multiple benefits. Could you speculate on that?