Evidence of meeting #79 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was progress.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Neil Maxwell  Interim Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Office of the Auditor General of Canada
David Sawyer  Vice-President, Climate, Energy and Partnerships, International Institute for Sustainable Development
Vicky Sharpe  President and Chief Executive Officer, Sustainable Development Technology Canada

9:20 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

The selection and nomination is being addressed now for that vacancy. The work of the IJC has not in any way.... I've met with the IJC—

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Kirsty Duncan Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

When will it be filled, please?

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

In the fullness of time. We're addressing it now. The nomination process doesn't happen immediately.

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Kirsty Duncan Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

In the budget, the lower Great Lakes levels—

9:25 a.m.

An hon. member

I have a point of order.

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Harold Albrecht

There's a point of order. Who's raising it?

Mr. Storseth.

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

Mr. Chair, the minister is trying to answer Ms. Duncan's questions. If she'd just give him another 10 seconds.... I'm actually interested in the answers to some of her questions.

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Harold Albrecht

Thank you, Mr. Storseth.

Ms. Duncan.

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Kirsty Duncan Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

Thank you.

The minister was good enough to answer my question. There is a vacancy.

In the budget, the lower levels of the Great Lakes is mentioned. I'm wondering if you could table with the committee what solutions the government is considering, if they can be tabled. When will the government act?

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

First of all, if you read the IJC report, you'll see there are no easy solutions to the record levels that we have seen in some of the Great Lakes. There is some discussion of examining again the possibility of creating flow retardants in the St. Clair River. That has been examined in the past; we will look at it again. The problem is one of nature. Part of it can be attributed to climate change and warmer winters with no ice cover, very heavy evaporation, as much as 30% in some winters.

There's also the matter of what is called glacial isostatic adjustment. That is negatively affecting the economy, the tax base, and certainly the quality of life for folks living, for example, on the north side of Georgian Bay.

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Kirsty Duncan Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

Minister, I have only a few seconds left.

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

I'm describing the actions—

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Kirsty Duncan Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

What I asked was whether you could table the solutions, which you've kindly agreed to do. We understand some of the causes. What I asked was when the government would act. Perhaps you could table that.

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

Well, if I could just say, we have responded. We are considering the recommendations of the IJC, but as I said, there are no snap solutions to this problem.

9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Kirsty Duncan Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

I understand that.

I'm sure you're aware of the statements of the Minister of Natural Resources casting doubt about climate change, the 2° Celsius. The World Economic Forum ranks climate change as the third biggest concern overall, and failure to adapt to climate change is the biggest single environmental hazard facing the planet.

When the government is looking at environmental policy and adapting to climate change, whose advice does the Prime Minister rely on, yours or the Minister of Natural Resources'?

9:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Harold Albrecht

Okay. We're going to have to cut it off. We're a little over time. Maybe you can weave your answer back into it. We have five-minute rounds now, so maybe you can address it later.

We're moving to Madame Quach.

June 4th, 2013 / 9:25 a.m.

NDP

Anne Minh-Thu Quach NDP Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Minister, for being here with us this morning.

You talked a lot about the environmental footprint. In fact, chapter 4 discusses little else. However, a recent report indicates that in 2011, one additional megatonne of GHG was emitted into the atmosphere, as compared to 2010 levels. You know very well that the previous Commissioner of the Environment and the report of the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy both expressed serious doubts regarding the reduction of emissions and attaining the objectives by 2020.

In addition, the Canadian hydrocarbon industry intends to develop 14 new coal, gas and oil extraction projects over the next few years. Between now and 2020, they would produce a quantity of CO2 emissions equivalent of that of the United States. We are talking about 300 billion tonnes of new emissions from now until 2050. The oil sands will emit up to 420 million tonnes of greenhouse gases a year, and there is still no regulation, sector by sector, in this area, regarding GHG.

Last May 16, on its website, the World Bank talked about the importance of setting a price on carbon to fight climate change. Moreover, with all due respect, the provinces are the ones that have made all of the efforts to reduce greenhouse gases. Quebec and California have set up a carbon exchange.

Regarding greenhouse gases, I want to know, sector by sector, on what science your approach is based, and what are the costs involved.

9:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

We don't have nearly the time today to address the breadth of subjects that you've discussed—

9:30 a.m.

NDP

Anne Minh-Thu Quach NDP Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC

You have been working on this sectoral plan for a long time.

9:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

First of all, just let me say that the regulations are science-based. Environment Canada is very much a science-sourced department.

9:30 a.m.

NDP

Anne Minh-Thu Quach NDP Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC

Do you have an approach that allows you to compare your sectoral plan with the carbon exchange?

9:30 a.m.

Conservative

Stephen Woodworth Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

On a point of order, Mr. Chair.

If I may, I find it impossible to listen to the minister's evidence when the member questioning him keeps interrupting his answers. I would ask the chair to direct the member to allow the witness to answer the questions before she interrupts him, please.

Thank you.

9:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Harold Albrecht

Okay. Madame Quach.

9:30 a.m.

NDP

Anne Minh-Thu Quach NDP Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC

I was wondering if you have an approach that allows you to compare you sectoral plan to the carbon exchange. They have one in Quebec and California, among other places.

9:30 a.m.

Conservative

Peter Kent Conservative Thornhill, ON

First of all, as I've said any number of times in the House, and as the Prime Minister has said, we have no intention of imposing a carbon tax.

We respect those provinces which have created carbon pricing of different sorts—