I appreciate that.
Mr. Sawyer, I think committee members, if they listened to your testimony very carefully as I did, would have been quite surprised when you made the comment, which I actually agree with, that sustainable development is disappointing. I don't know if you used the word “disappointing”, but you expressed concern that it was equated only with the environment. To use your words, you said uses of sustainable development had “a myopic focus on environment alone”.
Having read the Brundtland commission report myself, can you define sustainable development, or describe the definition of sustainable development as it came out in the Brundtland commission report and comment on the notion of sustainable development being equated only as an environmental concept?