We fundamentally disagree with doing that, especially with the offshore boards. If you actually read their mandates, they were set up to promote the offshore development, and they're also assessing the projects. So how do you get unbiased advice to government from an agency if you say, “Your job is to promote this, and your job is also to assess it”? You can't get the same thing. So that should not have been done.
It's the same with the NEB and CNSC. They have a regulatory role. They should be kept as regulators. They should not be actually making decisions about what should be assessed, and they should not be running the assessments. That should be a separate role for the agency that does assessments, because it's a wider and more important role.