Yes, it's truthful but not comforting.
Second, with your invasive species issue, I agree with you on the Asian carp. That's a pretty serious issue, and it is a bit disconcerting.
In terms of ballast water in ships on the Great Lakes, the EPA has put in a regulatory framework. It was imposed last month. I'm given to understand that there's very little likelihood that many ships can actually comply with that regulatory environment, and that, only coincidentally, any ship built prior to 2009 is exempt from that regulatory requirement, which only seems to be coincidental that it is in the entire U.S. fleet but it would apply much less so to the Canadian fleet.
Is my factual rendition of that issue correct, and if so, where are we going to go from here? It seems to be a use of a regulatory environment to be unfairly discriminatory against one side of the fleet as opposed to the other side of the fleet.