Well, certainly, if one looked at the inevitability of urban development and decided that in addition to the other things that urban growth is required to pay it should also contribute to further environmental enhancements.... I think Bonnie indicated that we're approaching that through more of a low-impact development kind of scenario, whereby the developer would look at maintaining the hydrological characteristics of the land, after development occurs, and maintaining habitat characteristics and other such things within the area they're involved with.
I think our experience with having the developers, in effect, be taxed—and effectively that's what would happen, because the money would then be pooled and then moved to do remediation in another area.... Obviously, this would provoke a political discussion, and I would anticipate significant pushback on it.