Absolutely. What happens is sometimes you get really good work done by groups looking to achieve some goal: trying to revive the wolf population in an area; trying to save this fisheries; trying to look at endocrine-disrupting chemicals and see if they can be reduced. As I said earlier, if you're just focusing on one of those goals, the implementer should be doing that, but you need a higher framework in which they are participating to make sure that those are interrelated and appropriate for the priorities in your area. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals may not be the priority for your area.
On April 3rd, 2014. See this statement in context.