I'm sorry. I'm speaking about land mass. I hear nothing yet, but if you have something that justifies in a credible scientific way whether it's a 10%, 17%, or 20% target, I'd be grateful to receive it.
Let me say that in your comments under general observations, there was a statement that “most of the targets are not specific and key actions needed to achieve them have not been developed.” Would I be safe in saying that a target without associated key actions is of very limited value?