I acknowledge your point about driving the bulldozer through it; however, I've read the recommendations of what Friends of the Rouge Watershed want in amendments, and the amendments they want go back to what was there before. You can probably put a bulldozer through it, but let's just suppose in the future we have a minister who wants to take it the other way. Do you honestly believe that once they've reforested seven, eight, or ten thousand acres of land that he's going to say, “Well, now we're going to pull out all those trees back and go back?”
We can only go one way, right?