Maybe we should ask the minister why she would make that choice of sunsetting those particular moneys.
I'm hoping that my colleagues will agree to have the minister come in and answer that question. I won't hold my breath, but maybe we'll see.
My second question also has to do with the mains, and it's kind of a curious set of numbers for “Biodiversity—Wildlife and Habitat”. The expenditures are $120 million, yet your mains are only $91 million for the fiscal year ending on March 31, this month, and your mains for the following year are back up to $122 million.
Why would the main estimates in effect last year be so much lower than what you apparently expended the year before?