Yes. I think the first question was around the real challenges to habitat loss. I think one of the biggest challenges we have is the death by a thousand cuts, basically the cumulative impacts of a lot of people doing very little things that over time result in major effects. We often deal with projects particularly at the federal level that are big projects and that sort of thing, but in many cases it's the things that people do every day in their own lives: whether they clear the weeds out in front of their cottage or whatever else, and when you start to multiply that across the landscape, it really makes an impact.
That comes to the pivotal point: you really have to know how much habitat is out there so that you know when you've lost it. Inventory of habitat is a huge thing, because then you can monitor whether you're losing it; you can assess whether your policies are working or not, and you can report back to the public on how your policies are working. I think that would be one of the key elements.
The other one, also related, is cumulative impacts. Habitat is one thing, but when you start to look at what a species is actually bombarded with, some habitat loss, combined with climate change, combined with an invasive species that comes in, combined with some different land use strategies that affect it, it all adds up to something you never would have predicted in the beginning.
Science is becoming a lot more complicated, such that you can't look at just one individual thing. It's all connected.