Absolutely.
Everything is tied to the implementation, and built into the agreement is the process we're supposed to follow with making sure that we meet and how we monitor all the details. These are very comprehensive agreements.
The agreement with Alberta is almost a hundred pages long, with appendices—it's very detailed. It is far different from the one that was done back in 1999 with the Yukon, which is probably a total of five pages. It's critical that we do the work to follow up on all of the detail that's laid out in the appendices, in terms of what is to be monitored and how we are to keep an eye on these things collectively.
I would point out, to the credit of Alberta and the Northwest Territories.... Mr. Fox talked about environmental flow needs. We've agreed with Alberta in the transboundary agreement that the amount of water that would be taken out for human use is 1.9% or 2%, so that means that 98% of the water has been identified to meet the needs of the aquatic ecosystems in Alberta and the Northwest Territories. It is one of the first transboundary agreements to actually do that and in fact nail down those environmental needs first and foremost.