Again, that is a very good question.
We would be happy to work on some of the long-term recommendations.
Off the top, looking at where those priorities are—one of the previous members talked about the Great Lakes and the Great Lakes agreement—it's looking at those priorities and providing a longer range. We find, looking at the history of the success of the rural water quality program, that it is human nature that people take some time to make plans. That is probably echoed in business and in the business of agriculture as well.
We need programs that have a longer lifespan so that we can do some planning because we're looking at individuals having to bring the decision-making to make a change in their business, whether that is agriculture or VeriForm. They need to make a business decision and make a business plan, so ensuring that there is a longer timeframe on some of those incentives or cost shares, tax reduction, whatever, seems to suit best for the business. We find that often we need to go and talk to the individuals who are looking for that support, so I think longer range, longer term, allows individuals to make those decisions and to build them into their plan. They may not be ready to implement now, but they will be in three to five years.